I think this is an artifact of a manual setup. Ordinarily, if booting from a zfs root pool, grub wouldn't even be able to read the menu.lst if it couldn't interpret the pool format.
I'm not sure what the entire sequence of events is here, so I'm not sure if there's a bug. Perhaps you could elaborate. Lori Jason King wrote: > Apparently with zfs boot, if the zpool is a version grub doesn't > recognize, it merely ignores any zfs entries in menu.lst, and > apparently instead boots the first entry it thinks it can boot. I ran > into this myself due to some boneheaded mistakes while doing a very > manual zfs / install at the summit. > > Shouldn't it at least spit out a warning? If so, I have no issues > filing a bug, but wanted to bounce it off those more knowledgeable in > this area than I am. > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
