Joerg Schilling wrote: > Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> The closest equivalent to ufsdump and ufsrestore is "star". >> I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is 'zfs >> send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the the >> actual on disk layout and is an integrated part of the filesystem >> implementation. > > I strongly disagree. Like ufsdump, star creates archives that allow a file > based access. This does not work with zfs send. >
But star doesn't support Solaris Extended attributes and ZFS ACLs. This means you *may* loose critical data if you use star. Whereas zfs send preserves everything. -Mark _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
