On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 01:12:08PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote: > >>>>> "pt" == Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > pt> I think the term is mirror mounts. > > he doesn't need them---he's using the traditional automounter, like we > all used to use before this newfangled mirror mounts baloney.
Oh man, I *love* mirror mounts -- they're *not* "baloney." > There were no mirror mounts with the old UFS NFSv3 setup that he > inherited, and it worked fine. Maybe mirror mounts are breaking the > automounter? Doubtful. There is a race condition in mirror mounts that can cause one or more of several threads racing to cause a mirror mount to happen to get an error. Usually you see that when running dmake. Otherwise mirror mounts work perfectly. > I think someone who knows the automounter better than I could explain > it, but one thing you migh try is to make the server and client's > filesystems similarly-nested. Right now you have: Yes, the OP needs hierarchical automount map entries. Nico -- _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
