We have 135 TB capacity with about 75 TB in use on zfs based storage.  
zfs use started about 2 years ago, and has grown from there.  This spans 
9 SAN appliances, with 5 "head nodes", and 2 more recent servers running 
zfs on JBOD with vdevs made up of raidz2. 

So far, the experience has been very positive.  Never lost a bit of 
data.  We scrub weekly, and I've started sleeping better at night.  I 
have also read the horror stories, but we aren't seeing them here. 

We did have some performance issues, especially involving the SAN 
storage on more heavily used systems, but enabling the cache on the SAN 
devices without pushing fsync through to disk basically fixed that.  
Your zfs layout can profoundly effect performance, which is a down 
side.  It's best to test your setup under an approximate realistic work 
load  to balance capacity with performance before deploying.

BTW, most of our zfs deployment is on Solaris 10{u4,u5}, but two large 
servers are on OpenSolaris svn86.  The OpenSolaris servers seem to be 
considerably faster, and more feature rich, without any reliability 
issues, so far.

Jon

gm_sjo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I  have built out an 8TB SAN at home using OpenSolaris + ZFS. I have
> yet to put it into 'production' as a lot of the issues raised on this
> mailing list are putting me off trusting my data onto the platform
> right now.
>
> Throughout time, I have stored my personal data on NetWare and now NT
> and this solution has been 100% reliable for the last 12 years. Never
> a single problem (nor have I had any issues with NTFS with the tens of
> thousands of spindles i've worked with over the years).
>
> I appreciate 99% of the time people only comment if they have a
> problem, which is why I think it'd be nice for some people who have
> successfully implemented ZFS, including making various use of the
> features (recovery, replacing disks, etc), could just reply to this
> post with a sentence or paragraph detailing how great it is for them.
> Not necessarily interested in very small implementations of one/two
> disks that haven't changed config since the first day it was
> installed, but more aimed towards setups that are 'organic' and have
> changed/been_administered over time (to show functionality of the
> tools, resilience of the platform, etc.)..
>
> .. Of course though, I guess a lot of people who may have never had a
> problem wouldn't even be signed up on this list! :-)
>
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
>   

-- 


-     _____/     _____/      /           - Jonathan Loran -           -
-    /          /           /                IT Manager               -
-  _____  /   _____  /     /     Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley
-        /          /     /      (510) 643-5146 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ______/    ______/    ______/           AST:7731^29u18e3
                                 


_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to