On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote: > > > > > Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out > > > Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell > > > them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week? > > > Someone knows? > > > > That it's not recommended for 32 bit systems. There may also be > > unfixed atomicity issues in 64-bit operations, according to past > > posts on this list. > > Well, he's talking Linux, which means FUSE, so the issues related to 32-bit > on Solaris don't apply as ZFS isn't running in kernel space which is where > the horrid performance issues come from (the ARC cache and the kernel > fighting > for address space). Maybe it would run well under 32-but Linux? I can't > speak to that as I refuse to run Linux. > > -brian > "Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern" Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not "zfs on fuse". --Tim
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
