On 11-Dec-08, at 12:28 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Anton, > > Thursday, December 11, 2008, 4:17:15 AM, you wrote: > >>> It sounds like you have access to a source of information that the >>> rest of us don't have access to. > > ABR> I think if you read the archives of this mailing list, and > ABR> compare it to the discussions on the other Solaris mailing lists > ABR> re UFS, it's a reasonable conclusion. > > Well, by following that logic one might deduct that there are much > more ZFS installations than UFS - because people are talking more > about ZFS than UFS these days. But hey, I doubt it is actually true. > > ZFS is very active when it comes to development and its development is > happening pretty much in public
And that perceived (or real) immaturity attracts blame (warranted or not). I think we have to assume Anton was joking - otherwise his measure is uselessly unscientific. --Toby > - that's why you can see much more > problems with ZFS - but I would argue that it is mostly perception if > anything else. > > -- > Best regards, > Robert Milkowski mailto:mi...@task.gda.pl > http://milek.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
