Gary Mills wrote: > The split responsibility model is quite appealing. I'd like to see > ZFS address this model. Is there not a way that ZFS could delegate > responsibility for both error detection and correction to the storage > device, at least one more sophisticated than a physical disk? > > Surely that removes one of ZFS's greatest features: end to end checksums. All you'd end up with is yet another volume manager.
No matter how good your SAN is, it won't spot a flaky cable or bad RAM. -- Ian. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
