BTW, is there any difference between raidz & raidz1 (is the one for one disk parity) or does raidz have a parity disk too?
Thanks, Jonny Tim wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jonny Gerold <j...@thermeon.com > <mailto:j...@thermeon.com>> wrote: > > Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list shows an incorrect > calculation? Can anyone agree that this looks like a bug? > > r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry > ambry 2.7T 27K 2.7T 1% /ambry > > r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > ambry 3.62T 132K 3.62T 0% ONLINE - > > r...@fsk-backup:~# zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > ambry 92.0K 2.67T 26.9K /ambry > > > From what I understand: > > zpool list shows total capacity of all the drives in the pool. df > shows usable capacity after parity. > > I wouldn't really call that retarded, it allows you to see what kind > of space you're chewing up with parity fairly easily. > > --Tim _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
