> People used fastfs for years in specific environments (hopefully 
> understanding the risks), and disabling the ZIL is safer than fastfs. 
> Seems like it would be a useful ZFS dataset parameter.

We agree.  There's an open RFE for this:

6280630 zil synchronicity

No promise on date, but it will bubble to the top eventually.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to