> > On Wed, April 14, 2010 08:52, Tonmaus wrote: > > safe to say: 2009.06 (b111) is unusable for the > purpose, ans CIFS is dead > > in this build. > > That's strange; I run it every day (my home Windows > "My Documents" folder > and all my photos are on 2009.06). > > > -bash-3.2$ cat /etc/release > OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b > X86 > Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All > Rights Reserved. > Use is subject to license > terms. > Assembled 07 May 2009
I would be really interested how you got past this http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11371 which I was so badly bitten by that I considered giving up on OpenSolaris. > not sure if this is best choice. I'd like to > hear from others as well. > Well, it's technically not a stable build. > > I'm holding off to see what 2010.$Spring ends up > being; I'll convert to > that unless it turns into a disaster. > > Is it possible to switch to b132 now, for example? I > don't think the old > builds are available after the next one comes out; I > haven't been able to > find them. There are methods to upgrade to any dev build by pkg. Can't tell you from the top of my head, but I have done it with success. I wouldn't know why to go to 132 instead of 133, though. 129 seems to be an option. Regards, Tonmaus -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
