On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Erik Trimble <erik.trim...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I'd have to re-look at the exact numbers, but, I'd generally say that > 2x6raidz2 vdevs would be better than either 1x12raidz3 or 4x3raidz1 (or > 3x4raidz1, for a home server not looking for super-critical protection (in > which case, you should be using mirrors with spares, not raidz*). I saw some stats a year or more ago that indicated the MTDL for raidZ2 was better than for a 2-way mirror. In order of best to worst I remember the rankings as: raidZ3 (least likely to lose data) 3-way mirror raidZ2 2-way mirror raidZ1 (most likely to lose data) This is for Mean Time to Data Loss, or essentially the odds of losing _data_ due to one (or more) drive failures. I do not know if this took number of devices per vdev and time to resilver into account. Non-redundant configurations were not even discussed. This information came out of Sun (pre-Oracle) and _may_ have been traceable back to Brendan Gregg. -- {--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---------7---------} Paul Kraus -> Senior Systems Architect, Garnet River ( http://www.garnetriver.com/ ) -> Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ( http://www.sloctheater.org/ ) -> Technical Advisor, RPI Players _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss