> From: Ian Collins [mailto:i...@ianshome.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:24 PM
> >> For ZIL, I
> >> suppose we could get the 300GB drive and overcommit to 95%!
> > What kind of benefit does that offer? I suppose, if you have a 300G
> > and the OS can only see 30G of it, then the drive can essentially treat
> > the other 290G as having been TRIM'd implicitly, even if your OS doesn't
> > support TRIM. It is certainly conceivable this could make a big
> > Have you already tested it? Anybody? Or is it still just theoretical
> > performance enhancement, compared to using a "normal" sized drive in a
> > normal mode?
> How would you test it? I guess you would need two pools, 2 SSDs (to
> compare) and a lot of small, sync writes.
I would say, one pool, one SSD. Run iozone.
Then swap the SSD, repeat iozone.
Some people will say bonnie instead of iozone. In this case, I think either
one is fine.
zfs-discuss mailing list