On Mon, 7 May 2012, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Apparently I pulled it down at some point, so I don't have a URL for you
anymore, but I did, and I posted. Long story short, both raidzN and mirror
configurations behave approximately the way you would hope they do. That
is...
Approximately, as compared to a single disk: And I *mean* approximately,
Yes, I remember your results.
In a few weeks I should be setting up a new system with OpenIndiana
and 8 SAS disks. This will give me an opportunity to test again.
Last time I got to play was back in Feburary 2008 and I did not bother
to test raidz
(http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/zfs-discuss/2540-zfs-performance.pdf).
Most common benchmarking is sequential read/write and rarely
read-file/write-file where 'file' is a megabyte or two and the file is
different for each iteration.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
