On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
> disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
> The performance is very very good on the server.
> I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS is
> very good :
> For example : Read from the client and write over NFS to ZFS:
> [root@ .tmp]# time tar xf /tmp/linux-3.7.5.tar
> real 1m7.244s
> user 0m0.921s
> sys 0m8.990s
> this client is on 1Gbits/s network cable and same network switch as the
> I've a second NFS client running FreeBSD 9.1-Stable, and on this second
> client the performance is catastrophic. After 1 hour the tar isn't finish.
> OK this second client is connect with 100Mbit/s and not on the same switch.
> But well from 2 min --> ~ 90 min ...:-(
> I've try for this second client to change on the ZFS-NFS server the
> zfs set sync=disabled
> and that change nothing.
I have been using FreeBSD 9 with ZFS and NFS to a couple Mac OS X (10.6.8 Snow
Leopard) boxes and I get between 40 and 50 MB/sec throughput on a Gigabit
ethernet link. Since you have already ruled out the known sync issue with ZFS
and no SSD-based write cache, then perhaps you are running into an NFS 3 vs.
NFS 4 issue. I am not sure if Mac OS X is using NFS 3 or NFS 4.
Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3
Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company
zfs-discuss mailing list