On 15 August 2013 08:52, Jaap Karssenberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> What I propose is the idea to add the question mark to lower the >> priority. In the example above, you can see that the task has had a high >> priority or importance in the beginning, and then the priority has been >> pushed back. >> > > I'm open to the sugegstion, and have been thinking myself along this line > as well. Basically assuming all issues are created equal, but some loosing > importance over time. > > I even thought about using the "?" for that - but I rejected it because I > also have quite a few action items where the action is a question and a "?" > naturally occurs in the description. So wondering if we could find another > notation that is natural but less likely to occur in task descriptions on > it;s own. > > It is often useful, when evaluating execution of projects, to know how >> items were prioritized. >> > > I usually use sub-bullets to add additional info, follow up comments etc. > and changes in prio / due date. > I didn't think of that problem because I put the question mark in the sub-bullet annotation of the task. TODO [d: 2013-08-14] Investigate procrastination of tasks * Is this a feature of zim which would be useful? * 2013-08-14 Short description of use case posted on mailing list But you are right, it would be a non-intuitive behaviour of zim. Workaround could be to use two or more spaces in front of a question mark which is to be counted. This questionmark should be made optional and disabled by default. Only if you know how to use it, it should be used. -- Svenn
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
