[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marc Schindler:
> ... but from the article in the latest Economist, ...
> Let me see if I can illustrate, ...
> That's my speculation, and I'm not an expert -- I'm just
> thinking out loud. Does it make sense, do you think?
> That's my take on it, fwiw.
> I personally believe we may very well find that it was an
> attack. I just hate to rush into confusions not supported
> by the record, and the Economist, based on your post,
> was taking a position 180 out from the rest of the wire
Wouldn't be the first time. They're actually hawkish on Iraq, which I disagree
with, even though I have the highest of respect for The Economist (you may have
> This is one of the dangers in jumping to conclusions
> based on first reports. Conclusions are much safer
> jumped to after additional information is gathered and
> consumed, IMO. However, I would be the first to admit
> that this method is decidedly less exciting.
> Larry Jackson
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the authorís employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!