Ah, but I would ("be so sure of that")!  You see, unlike some on this list,
I am willing to be led by President Bush.  I believe that he is honest and
sincere, and that he is no idiot.  I don't take everything as gospel, and I
don't agree with some of what he wants to do, but he will not lead us into
untenable situations.

As do I, although I'm not so sure that won't lead us into untenable
situations - mainly because his decisions are only going to be as good as
his sources.

By the way, to offset all the history revisionists, if you remember, under
Bush 41 we acted FIRST, and then built a coalition, not the other way
around.  Does anyone need the history lesson, or do you remember now?
I'm not saying you said this, it just popped into my mind as a result of
this post.)

What do you consider as first? IIRC, we did start troop movements, but the
first bombs didn't drop until after the coalition was in place.

Also, regarding the Russians; they agreed not to attack us outright, but
did leave Russian owned anti-air equipment in Iraq for Saddam to use. True,
it didn't help him much, but their compliance with the agreement was kinda

I'm not suggesting that they will renege on their votes, but they are
pretty skilled at skirting along the edges.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to