"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

>  For instance, to me a "socialist" is anyone who advocates government
> redistribution of the wealth from those who produce wealth to those who
> don't.  Using that definition the Democratic party is definitely
controlled
> by socialists.  But then using that definition, the Republicans are also
> controlled by socialists.  So what's the difference except in rhetoric?
>

Marc:
Such as laws which allowed the workers of Enron to have their pension funds
robbed
by the big brass....
(sorry, I couldn't resist, although I'm sure John would actually agree).

Dan:
But weren't those laws modified under Clinton's watch? The robberies
certainly were...

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to