"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

>  For instance, to me a "socialist" is anyone who advocates government
> redistribution of the wealth from those who produce wealth to those who
> don't.  Using that definition the Democratic party is definitely
> by socialists.  But then using that definition, the Republicans are also
> controlled by socialists.  So what's the difference except in rhetoric?

Such as laws which allowed the workers of Enron to have their pension funds
by the big brass....
(sorry, I couldn't resist, although I'm sure John would actually agree).

But weren't those laws modified under Clinton's watch? The robberies
certainly were...

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///

This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to