"John W. Redelfs" wrote:
> For instance, to me a "socialist" is anyone who advocates government
> redistribution of the wealth from those who produce wealth to those who
> don't. Using that definition the Democratic party is definitely
> by socialists. But then using that definition, the Republicans are also
> controlled by socialists. So what's the difference except in rhetoric?
Such as laws which allowed the workers of Enron to have their pension funds
by the big brass....
(sorry, I couldn't resist, although I'm sure John would actually agree).
But weren't those laws modified under Clinton's watch? The robberies
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!