[Dmitry Vasiliev] > Since then I've changed my mind and almost haven't used setdefault(). So > now I'm only +0 on the idea. :-) I think pop() is even more useful than > setdefault(), I've planned to use it for some persistent queue > implementation (based on BTrees). So if setdefault() will be added I > think it would be also useful to add the pop() method.
Since setdefault() is going into ZODB 3.5 (I'm going to merge Ruslan's branch into the trunk today), if anyone <hint> would like to code up pop() implementations too, I won't object. Overall, I like pop() better than setdefault() too. _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
