On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
modules).
zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
transaction-3.6.0.egg (which would include only the transaction
package).
zconfig-2.3.1.egg (which would include only the ZConfig package).
zodb-3.6.0.egg (which might be an empty "dependency" package that
depended on persistence, transaction, zodblib, and zconfig).
Anyone care?
First, "rah rah!".
Second, zodblib seems unlikely to be useful alone, but maybe I'm
wrong, and even if I'm right there's precedent for that sort of
thing in packaging land, so what the hey.
Well, I'm only an egg, as Michael Valentine would say, so I'm not
sure what the right thing is.
Third, I'd guess that zodb would contain the stitching for zconfig-
to-zodb. It makes me wonder if a zodb-without-zconfig egg would be
feasible/useful, but that's probably for later navel-staring.
Yeah, that'd be good. It's currently pretty dense in there.
- C
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
