Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-10-9 13:22 -0400:
...
Hm, I don't why the use cases imply setting it only at the class
level, but OK. I'll just take that as a given. So, since _p_sticky
is set at the class level, why store it on the instances?
...
use case 3, set on instance level.
I missed that. Sorry.
To make cache garbage collection as fast as possible,
I have proposed to actually store the sticky information in the
C object structure.
I don't like the idea of adding that overhead to every
persistent object just for this use case. OTOH, we only
need a bit and I think we had a few spare bits. So maybe
this wouldn't require any new space.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
