David Binger wrote:
This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if
there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on
a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis.
Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just
Session-like changes could include a message to the server
indicating that this transaction is not precious.

Nah, too subtle/fragile/complicated...

...that's my gut feel anyway.

I really like the proposal as it stands though :-)


Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to