On 11/1/07, Matt Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting idea.  Surely we need the opposite though, and that is an
> additional BTree with a very large bucket size, as we want to minimize the
> chance of a bucket split when inserting?  Then we occasionally consolidate and
> move the items in the original BTree with the regular bucket size/branch 
> factor.

Would it be possible to not "occasionally" consolidate, but actually
do it ongoing, but just one process, thereby always inserting just one
transaction into the normal BTree at a time? Or does that cause
troubles?

//In way over my head.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev

Reply via email to