On 11/1/07, Matt Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An interesting idea. Surely we need the opposite though, and that is an > additional BTree with a very large bucket size, as we want to minimize the > chance of a bucket split when inserting? Then we occasionally consolidate and > move the items in the original BTree with the regular bucket size/branch > factor.
Would it be possible to not "occasionally" consolidate, but actually do it ongoing, but just one process, thereby always inserting just one transaction into the normal BTree at a time? Or does that cause troubles? //In way over my head. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
