Wichert Akkerman wrote:
For some of us a the main reason for using RelStorage is to be able to
satisfy the 'all data must be stored in our oracle cluster' requirement
from enterprise customers. That means we can not use NFS mounts to store
blobs.
You have a point, and I know how stubborn enterprises can be.
Here's an approach that will probably work: keep blob handling
completely separate from other database operations and open a different
database connection for each thread. Maintain pseudo-file-handle state
completely outside the database.
This design could be independent of RelStorage. We could create a
wrapper much like the current <blobstorage> but put the blobs in the
database instead.
Shane
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
