David Pratt wrote:
> There is no lack of storage options out there these days. My opinion
> is that if you want the true characteristics of the storage, you
> won't make it behave like a zodb. Lovely systems came to a similar
> conclusion after trying relstorage and then moving to use storm in a
> more direct way.
This is essentially the same conclusion that ended the Ape project.
However, from my experience with RelStorage, I believe that ZODB remains
useful and that it can be improved upon.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org