David Pratt wrote:
> There is no lack of storage options out there these days. My opinion  
> is that if you want the true characteristics of the storage, you  
> won't make it behave like a zodb. Lovely systems came to a similar  
> conclusion after trying relstorage and then moving to use storm in a  
> more direct way.

This is essentially the same conclusion that ended the Ape project. 
However, from my experience with RelStorage, I believe that ZODB remains 
useful and that it can be improved upon.


For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to