Jim Fulton wrote: > Well said. A feature I'd like to add is the ability to have persistent > objects that don't get their own database records, so that you can get > the benefit of having them track their changes without incuring the > expense of a separate database object.
+lots Hanno Schlichting recently posted a nice graph showing the persistent structure of a Plone Page object and it's 9 (!) sub-objects. http://blog.hannosch.eu/2009/05/visualizing-persistent-structure-of.html A sub-persitent type would allow us to fix the latency problems we experience without needing to re-engineer Archetypes at the same time. Laurence _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
