Jim Fulton wrote:
> Well said. A feature I'd like to add is the ability to have persistent
> objects that don't get their own database records, so that you can get
> the benefit of having them track their changes without incuring the
> expense of a separate database object.
Hanno Schlichting recently posted a nice graph showing the persistent
structure of a Plone Page object and it's 9 (!) sub-objects.
A sub-persitent type would allow us to fix the latency problems we
experience without needing to re-engineer Archetypes at the same time.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org