-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > >>> Another issue is that, as things are now, while an index is being >>> saved, no transactions can be committed. This is less serious now >>> that saving indexes is much faster, however, saving a large index >>> may still take several seconds, and that might be a problem for >>> some applications. >>> >>> I'd be happy to add an option to save indexes after every N >>> records written, where N would be given by the option. >> So what is the difference between such a new option and fixing the >> "flawed" >> algorithm as mentioned above? > > There would be explicit control. You's be able to say how often (in > terms of records written) you'd save indexes.
Assuming we could get this feature with ZODB 3.10 (perhaps with a funding).. could ZODB 3.8 clients (Zope 2.11) safely talk with a ZODB 3.10 ZEO server? Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktqu/sACgkQCJIWIbr9KYzQhwCdFvlwf60TovhujXkchwAFp/Up lfoAoLbHUp1BI/3l/GogvG7PH5FpJFPh =7XhT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
