On 03/22/2010 03:09 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> I am currently testing gocept.zeoraid, and this seems to work fine.
> However, I have few questions:
> - I tested like my clumsy customers would use it (that means doing
> things in the wrong order for instance).
> I did a similar setup that the one located in the Zope SVN: two
> ZEO server as backend, and two ZEO Raid server on top of it,
> connected to two Zope clients. I stop one backend ZEO server.
> I did raid-manage status, and details and it work fine.
> After, I executed raid-manage recover 1, 1 being the backend ZEO
> server I previously stopped, and did details again. I have
> 'recovering: ???'. Which is ok since I didn't start again my
> backend ZEO server. But if I start it after, the status doesn't
> change. If I do again raid-manage recover 1, the status stays the
> same (and the command display None).
> I think this is bad, as I can't expect my customer to always do
> things in the correct step (that would be too easy).
> Done in the correct order that seems to work fine. But I need to do
> more testing.
Yeah, sounds like a bug. Do you mind reporting that into launchpad?
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org