> So, the best place to call those would be during my commit break (whenever I > decide to take it? [which would be less often if I could be sure of no > crashing]). Are there any other problems with the way I was using ZODB in > my code? I really like it, but I recognize that it's a lot more complicated > than my old system.
Correct. Pick appropriate place where you are "finished" with a batch of objects and possibly have them no longer referenced. Then you can call cacheMinimize. You can call cacheGC to reduce memory usage. Your code looks straight forward. I do not see it doing anything strange. It's more complicated than old system? Ugh. That sucks. The ZODB should be LESS complicated than sqlite+custom rolled caching. If not than you may be doing something wrong or ZODB is not living up to its promise *wink* cheers alan _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
