> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Marius Gedminas <mar...@gedmin.as> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:26:10AM +0100, Kaweh Kazemi wrote: >>> Thanks a lot for the investigation, Marius. That was awesome. >>> >>> Seems to me, I need to upgrade to Python 2.7 and be done with the >>> problem then. :/ >> >> I wonder, though, if ZODB ought to use the 'noload' method of >> cPickle.Unpickler, which is undocumented and broken on 2.6 (and gone on >> 3.x, AFAIU). > > noload exists for ZODB. > > We ZC (DC at the time) wrote cPickle because ZODB needed a > highly-optimized > pickler. There are a number of decisions we made specifically with > ZODB in mind. > > I don't think the Python 3 version of cPickle reflects these > priorities. I strongly suspect > we'll end up having our own cPickle in the long run. >
It would be wonderful if ZODB settled on an internal version of cPickle that didn't use recursion so we could Pickler.dump() OFS.File objects bigger than 32mb :-) Cheers, Darryl Dixon Winterhouse Consulting Ltd http://www.winterhouseconsulting.com _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
