On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:35, Sean Upton <sdup...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM,  <jason.mad...@nextthought.com> wrote:
>> I only spotted two uses of this assumption in RelStrorage, the 
>> above-mentioned `_prepare_tid`, plus `pack`. The following simple patch to 
>> change those places to use `raw` makes our own internal tests (python2.7, 
>> MySQL) pass.
> Why not fork https://github.com/zodb/relstorage and submit a pull request?

Because I didn't realize that repository existed :) I will do so, thanks.

On that note, though, the PyPI page still links to the SVN repository at 
http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/trunk/ (which is also what comes up in a Google 
search), and that repository still has all its contents; it's missing the 
'MOVED_TO_GITHUB' file that's commonly there when the project has been moved 
(e.g., [1]). With a bit of searching I found the announcement on this list that 
development had been moved[2], but to a first glance it looks like SVN is still 
the place to be. If the move is complete, maybe it would be good to replace the 
SVN contents with the MOVED_TO_GITHUB pointer?


[1] http://svn.zope.org/zope.keyreference/trunk/
[2] https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2012-September/014763.html

For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to