On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:35, Sean Upton <sdup...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, <jason.mad...@nextthought.com> wrote: >> I only spotted two uses of this assumption in RelStrorage, the >> above-mentioned `_prepare_tid`, plus `pack`. The following simple patch to >> change those places to use `raw` makes our own internal tests (python2.7, >> MySQL) pass. > > Why not fork https://github.com/zodb/relstorage and submit a pull request?
Because I didn't realize that repository existed :) I will do so, thanks. On that note, though, the PyPI page still links to the SVN repository at http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/trunk/ (which is also what comes up in a Google search), and that repository still has all its contents; it's missing the 'MOVED_TO_GITHUB' file that's commonly there when the project has been moved (e.g., [1]). With a bit of searching I found the announcement on this list that development had been moved[2], but to a first glance it looks like SVN is still the place to be. If the move is complete, maybe it would be good to replace the SVN contents with the MOVED_TO_GITHUB pointer? Jason [1] http://svn.zope.org/zope.keyreference/trunk/ [2] https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2012-September/014763.html _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
