On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:35, Sean Upton <sdup...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, <jason.mad...@nextthought.com> wrote:
>> I only spotted two uses of this assumption in RelStrorage, the
>> above-mentioned `_prepare_tid`, plus `pack`. The following simple patch to
>> change those places to use `raw` makes our own internal tests (python2.7,
>> MySQL) pass.
> Why not fork https://github.com/zodb/relstorage and submit a pull request?
Because I didn't realize that repository existed :) I will do so, thanks.
On that note, though, the PyPI page still links to the SVN repository at
http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/trunk/ (which is also what comes up in a Google
search), and that repository still has all its contents; it's missing the
'MOVED_TO_GITHUB' file that's commonly there when the project has been moved
(e.g., ). With a bit of searching I found the announcement on this list that
development had been moved, but to a first glance it looks like SVN is still
the place to be. If the move is complete, maybe it would be good to replace the
SVN contents with the MOVED_TO_GITHUB pointer?
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org