NP. Right, I believe that was the gist - someone experienced in Maven to review and provide feedback on the poms.


Hiram Chirino wrote:
sry.. must be my eyes getting weak :)

So he just want's folks to review the poms?

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm missing the reference to double trouble, where does he say that?

Hiram Chirino wrote:
Double trouble?  What's he mean by that?

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure if you noticed this discussion on hadoop core-dev:

In particular:
"it would help if someone wishing to use Maven had a look at
the poms and warned of trouble before they actually went up into the
central repository"

As I mentioned previously we will most likely follow core's lead on this
(both in terms of build as well as release process).



Hiram Chirino wrote:
commented.  Basically deploying the the maven repo is the same as
deploying the final release artifact (it's just at a different
directory on the same machine and has a different directory

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hiram, I updated 224 with a few questions, if you could provide some
insight that would be helpful.


Hiram Chirino wrote:
I created issue:
to track the request.

Who's the current ZooKeeper release manager?

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Hiram Chirino
Hi Guys,

I've create a small maven 2 repository for the ZooKeeper 3.0.0

Ideally the ZooKeeper PMC can review the artifacts validate that they
match the release, GPG sign all the poms and jars and push them out
the main apache m2 maven repository so it can get synchronized into
the maven central repo.  That's at

But For now maven users of ZooKeeper can add the following to their
build to automatically download the release:

  <name>Private ZooKeeper Repo</name>



Open Source SOA

Reply via email to