Flavio Paiva Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-276:

    Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-276.patch

On issue 1: we have checked with Patrick Hunt (and Patrick checked with Doug 
Cutting) that it is ok to use org.apache.bookkeeper). I also prefer it that way;

On issue 2: Unfortunately my compiler doesn't complain about the override tags 
you mentioned (I'm on macos, jvm 1.6.0), so I just removed the ones you pointed 
out. Please give it another try.

> Bookkeeper contribution
> -----------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-276
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Luca Telloli
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-276.patch, ZOOKEEPER-276.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-276.patch, ZOOKEEPER-276.patch, ZOOKEEPER-276.patch
> BookKeeper is a system to reliably log streams of records. In BookKeeper, 
> servers are "bookies", log streams are "ledgers", and each unit of a log (aka 
> record) is a "ledger entry". BookKeeper is designed to be reliable; bookies, 
> the servers that store ledgers can be byzantine, which means that some subset 
> of the bookies can fail, corrupt data, discard data, but as long as there are 
> enough correctly behaving servers the service as a whole behaves correctly; 
> the meta data for BookKeeper is stored in ZooKeeper.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to