[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850008#action_12850008
 ] 

Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-725:
----------------------------------------

bq. It seems to be that client/server separation and build re-org seem like a 
logical first steps. Mockito + unit tests might come next. Stress/performance 
are ok to be added lately, because these might require some additional 
infrastructure/framework efforts.

seems reasonable. Henry, I have a pending test patch, now that 3.3.0 is in the 
bag can you review/commit that to trunk?

Cos, what's best practice for passing information into a test? In this case say 
we are passing the server port information into the client tests. How best to 
do this? jvm parameters (-Dzk.server.host1=host1:1234)? parameterized junit 
tests seem overkill for just a single test, no?

> Test organization, methodology, and infrastructure improvements 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-725
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-725
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: build, tests
>            Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
>
> This is an umbrella feature for a number of improvements needed to happen in 
> ZK test realm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to