[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850008#action_12850008
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-725:
----------------------------------------
bq. It seems to be that client/server separation and build re-org seem like a
logical first steps. Mockito + unit tests might come next. Stress/performance
are ok to be added lately, because these might require some additional
infrastructure/framework efforts.
seems reasonable. Henry, I have a pending test patch, now that 3.3.0 is in the
bag can you review/commit that to trunk?
Cos, what's best practice for passing information into a test? In this case say
we are passing the server port information into the client tests. How best to
do this? jvm parameters (-Dzk.server.host1=host1:1234)? parameterized junit
tests seem overkill for just a single test, no?
> Test organization, methodology, and infrastructure improvements
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-725
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-725
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: build, tests
> Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik
>
> This is an umbrella feature for a number of improvements needed to happen in
> ZK test realm
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
