Eric, this is great. I've slated the change for 3.4.0, if you could address the RAT issue (add license header), resubmit and someone will review and work with you to get committed.

Thanks! And getting the client bindings would be great too.


On 04/21/2010 08:32 PM, Eric Hauser wrote:
I submitted the Jute changes back as ZOOKEEPER-747.

Regarding contrib, I'd be happy to submit the client bindings back once
I do a bit more cleanup.

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Patrick Hunt <
<>> wrote:

    Hi Eric, this sounds great! Please consider submitting the client
    binding back, you could start it as a contrib package (src/contrib)
    until things settle and you get some usage. We recently have been
    seeing interest in running ZK on windows servers, so having .net
    would be awesome.

    It would be nice to see the Jute support, btw this is a port of
    Hadoop's "recordio" package from a few years ago. We are actually
    looking to move to Avro at some point, I'm sure they would love to
    have .net support as well.



    On 04/15/2010 05:55 PM, Eric Hauser wrote:


        I've ported the Java ZK client to .NET.  It's available for
        forking at  It is still in very
        early stages,
        but all of the client tests that I have ported complete
        successfully - both
        normal calls and watches are working successfully.  Some things
        to keep in

        - It's not actively being used at the moment
        - I have not had any chance to do any performance testing
        - The API will definitely be changing.  I've ported watches over
        as is in
        order to get everything working, but I'll be changing that to
        use events
        instead to make it more .NET-like.
        - There are not any asynchronous methods on the ZK client API --
        method calls are easy to do .NET.  May add a wrapper for it at
        some point.

        If there is any interest in having any part of my work go back
        into trunk,
        I'm happy to sign the ASF release.  In particular, it would be
        nice if the
        C# support I added to Jute made it back into the core code base.

Reply via email to