>> The ability to dynamically modify the server list on the client side
>> seems like it would be required no matter what approach were taken to
>> dynamic clusters.
> Hasn't come up before, but yes I agree it's a useful feature.
I agree with Dave that this is quite important for a truly dynamic
membership experience. I think I improperly imagined the two as being
inherently part of the same problem before, but I see they could be
split into different ones now that you mention it.