> Yes, that's what I meant - we could update the ZK client lib to do this. It
> would be invisible to the client application (your code) itself.

I don't think that's a bad idea, and the general approach in ZK-146 of
using an interface that gets called to retrieve the list of hosts
seems good (so that you aren't tied to a specific implementation of
hosts lists, be it HTTP or DNS). That said, I don't think the actual
implementation of ZK-146 is a good solution, since it only resolves
the host list once. An implementation that resolved it on each
disconnection would be better but require deeper changes to the


Reply via email to