Thomas Koch updated ZOOKEEPER-837:

    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

first try without testing. Would like to hear your opinion about the direction.

> cyclic dependency ClientCnxn, ZooKeeper
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.1
>            Reporter: Patrick Datko
>            Assignee: Thomas Koch
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
> ZooKeeper instantiates ClientCnxn in its ctor with this and therefor builds a 
> cyclic dependency graph between both objects. This means, you can't have the 
> one without the other. So why did you bother do make them to separate classes 
> in the first place?
> ClientCnxn accesses ZooKeeper.state. State should rather be a property of 
> ClientCnxn. And ClientCnxn accesses zooKeeper.get???Watches() in its method 
> primeConnection(). I've not yet checked, how this dependency should be 
> resolved better.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to