Regarding cygwin (just to let u guys know): We've built our zookeeper environment 2 month ago and one of the different server types is (unfortunately) still running on Windows (Server 2008 64 bit) only. Zookeeper + cygwin works perfectly for us.
Jan On Nov 3, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Notice that buildbot now has windows 7 support: > http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html > also I notice that hudson has windows 2008 server > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/computer/windows1/ > > We should see if we can get ZK up on these to help with compatibility > testing. Would be nice to catch cygwin as well - note that we support > unix/cygwin today (although it's been a while since anyone tried > cygwin afaik). > > Any interest in adding support for cmake? (the benefit of cmake is > that it can generate native build environment, VS project for windows, > makefiles for unix, etc...) > > Patrick > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Fournier, Camille F. [Tech] > <camille.fourn...@gs.com> wrote: >> Thanks Mahadev. We are using those C# bindings but also need native windows >> C/C++. Every language all the time! >> >> C >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:maha...@yahoo-inc.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:06 AM >> To: firstname.lastname@example.org >> Subject: Re: Windows port of ZK C api >> >> Hi Camille, >> I think definitely there is. I think a build script with a set of >> requirements and a nice set of docs on how to start using it would be great. >> BTW, there is a C# binding which someone wrote earlier >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings >> >> You can take a look at that and see if you want to extend that or write your >> own. >> >> Thanks >> mahadev >> >> >> On 11/3/10 7:18 AM, "Fournier, Camille F. [Tech]" <camille.fourn...@gs.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We have a requirement for a native windows-compatible version of the ZK C >>> api. >>> We're currently working on various ways to do this port, but would very much >>> like to submit this back to you all when we are finished so that we don't >>> have >>> to maintain the code ourselves through future releases. Is there interest in >>> having this? What would you need with this patch (build scripts, etc) to >>> accept it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Camille >>> >>> >> >>