With 6 +1's (3 PMC) and no -1's the vote passes. I'm working to
publish the release and will send announcements as soon as that's
done.

Patrick

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> I put it up on a cluster under hbase and ran loads against it over
> last few hours.  Nothing untoward in logs.  Played around w/ zkcli.
> It seems to behaving same as 3.3.1.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Python looks good.
>>
>> On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mic...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got
>>> similar numbers as 3.3.0.
>>>
>>> --Michi
>>>
>>> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <maha...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 for the release.
>>> >
>>> > Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
>>> > zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they
>>> are
>>> > deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > mahadev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>>> >> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>>> >> release notes for details.
>>> >>
>>> >> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>> >>
>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>> >>
>>> >> Should we release this?
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrick
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Robinson
>> Software Engineer
>> Cloudera
>> 415-994-6679
>>
>

Reply via email to