Depending on your needs, there may be other recipes as well that would give
higher performance.

For example, it might be preferable to keep the queue itself in a small-ish
set of files that each hold many task items.

Different implementations will give different trade-offs on speed,
especially for extremely large queues of pending tasks.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Mahadev Konar <>wrote:

> > Also are there any performance numbers of zookeeeper based queues. How
> does
> > it compare with JMS.

Ted Dunning, CTO

Reply via email to