On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Client 2 is not guaranteed to see X if it doesn't get to asking before
> the
> > value has been updated to Y.
> >
> Right, but I wouldn't expect the watch to be triggered twice with value Y.

It may not have been.  It may have been triggered with the change from x to
x, but by the time the client got around to
looking when the value was already y.  The trigger and the value are not

Reply via email to