Hi Jens!
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 11 Sep 2005, at 17:22, yuppie wrote:
The Actions thing is another issue that I noticed today. On the trunk,
we seem to have "old style" actions on some tools (I specifically
looked at the Membership and Memberdata tools because I'm re-doing
CMFLDAP) that are not being used at all because they are now new-style
actions in the Actions tool, and indeed those tools are not even
registered as action providers anymore. Any objections to removing
those old-style actions from tools that are no longer set up as action
providers?
+1
I hope the pending CMFSetup refactorings will make it easier to
extract specific settings from profiles and to make them selectable
in the add forms for tools, FTIs and workflows. (Just like complete
profiles are selectable in the site add form.)
I'm assuming the "settings" you mean here would be the equivalent of
being able to instantiate CMFSetup-controlled types manually in the
Types tool without going to the Setup tool? Yes, that functionality is
missing. What's the ETA on those refactorings? Sounds interesting.
I have some ideas, but I don't know exactly what Tres is working on and
what the discussions of the next 2 weeks (CMF 2.0 roadmap, CMF/Five
sprint) will bring. So I just could speculate at the moment.
I didn't mean that the refactorings will bring such a functionality out
of the box. I just said I'm hopeful that implementing it becomes easier.
So in the end it looks like while we're retaining FTIs in CMF for
backwards compatibility (thus already providing the answer to one
question) it is perfectly safe for me in my products to do away with
them. That was the implied question ;)
Yes. That should be perfectly safe.
Cheers,
Yuppie
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
