Hi Tres!
Tres Seaver wrote:
I owe another proposal on filesystem export / import of content, but
this one was a prerequisite. Please comment on the list, as the
discussion facilities on the site are pretty much useless.
http://www.zope.org/Products/CMF/docs/requirements/proposals/GenericSetup_architecture
I'm not sure if I understand the proposed way to register SetupHandlers:
Obviously you propose a new global registry for available SetupHandlers
with new API and ZCML for registering SetupHandlers.
At the first glance that makes export_steps.xml and import_steps.xml
obsolete. But there is the MetaProfile that has to be shipped with a
BaselineProfile and that is maintained in the tool. Why do we still need
MetaProfiles? Can't we just walk through a site/profile and
export/import each object that has a handler?
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2005-September/022877.html
proposes to use im- and export adapters for content objects. Can't we do
the same for config objects, registering the SetupHandlers as adapters?
And get rid of the special SetupHandler registries completely?
Cheers,
Yuppie
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
