On 13 Dec 2005, at 11:01, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Also, why is the meta_type information duplicated in typesinfo.xml
and types/foo.xml?
The adapter for the container is responsible for creating empty sub-
objects. So in this case the TypesToolXMLAdapter needs to know the
meta_type information to find the correct class.
Ok I thought it would be something like that. I don't like it but I
don't see another option.
The meta_type information in types/foo.xml isn't strictly
necessary, but it allows to see to which meta_type the XML file
belongs and to check the meta_type before applying an XML file to
an object.
Yes I agree that it's good to have it in types/foo.xml for
consistency and self-sufficiency.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
