LEE Kwan Soo wrote: > > Oh, well, I'd bet this is a silly question. But I can not resist nor find answer by >myself. > > Q: Why don't you BTree-fy all the subclasses of ObjectManager? > Is there a reason that anyone but can a newbie see? Obviously what BTreeFolder does should be available in standard folders. That is a long-term goal for Zope. BTreeFolder only exists to scope out the need for big folders as well as provide the capability in the short term. Shane _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
- [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Shane Hathaway
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder. Just a Ne... LEE Kwan Soo
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder. Just ... Shane Hathaway
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder. J... Bill Anderson
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolde... Shane Hathaway
- [Zope-dev] BTreeFolder w/ Customize... Steve Alexander
- Re: [Zope-dev] BTreeFolder w/ C... Phillip J. Eby
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolde... Steve Alexander
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Kapil Thangavelu
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Kapil Thangavelu
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Shane Hathaway
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Toby Dickenson
- Re: [Zope-dev] New version of BTreeFolder Steve Alexander