On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:

> Tres Seaver wrote:
> >
> > ...it is quite feasible to have one or more storages
> > inside your Zope ... often at a non-trivial time cost.
> Where does the time cost come in? I've noticed a delay on first
> mounting another storage, but I haven't looked for a delay on
> accessing objects in the storage.

I was talking about a time cost for "packless" storage;  updates
are typically harder to do, especially in a transactional way,
than appends.

I don't have any sense that mounted storages induce significant
performance penalties.

Tres Seaver                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Creations     "Zope Dealers"       http://www.zope.org

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to