Phillip J. Eby wrote: > P.S. Speaking of naming, I still dislike "feature" as a term for interface > implementations; various suggestions available on the "Feature" page of the > ComponentArchitecture Wiki. :)
I agree. I still much prefer 'adaptor' and I don't buy the 'adaptors sound too much like a light-weight layer' argument. If people agree, I will go through the Zope 3 CVS and change all references from Feature to Adaptor. :) Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
