Sidnei da Silva wrote: > On Seg 01 Jul 2002 15:26, Jim Fulton wrote: > | I'll add that the current ZPT implementation is too slow > | (thanks to recent DTML speedups ;). > | > | ZPT needs to be as fast as or faster than DTML. It would be > | great if it was cleaner and more pluggable. > | > | Jim > > I remember that i had the same concern when discussing this with lalo, and he > told me that this should be faster, as TAL-Current stores a binary > representation of the XML Parsed source, and his version is based on PAX, and > this would not need to be pre-compiled and stored. Unfortunately I cannot > give more information as this explanation seemed fine to me at that time.
I'm far less concerned with parsing speed than with execution speed. I find it hard to believe that an implementation that parses every time a page is rendered will be faster than an implementation that renders from a compiled form. Jim -- -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
