On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:46:26 -0400
Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:43, Casey Duncan wrote:
> > In retrospect I probably should have just marked it as deferred
> > rather than rejected, the idea was more to provoke action (which I
> > did) then to reject it as not-a-bug.
> 
> I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that
> doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like "deferred" seems to. 
> This category should also be selected in the default search settings.

+1

I volunteer Chris to implement it ;^)

-Casey


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to