On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:46:26 -0400 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:43, Casey Duncan wrote: > > In retrospect I probably should have just marked it as deferred > > rather than rejected, the idea was more to provoke action (which I > > did) then to reject it as not-a-bug. > > I think there needs to be another category named "wontfix" that > doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like "deferred" seems to. > This category should also be selected in the default search settings. +1 I volunteer Chris to implement it ;^) -Casey _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )